Family Meals Focus

The Ellyn Satter Institute Newsletter

ARFID: What is it? What does it have to do with feeding dynamics and eating competence?

by Ellyn Satter, Family Therapist and Registered Dietitian

Most problems with eating and feeding are not psychiatric disorders. They are problems, and, as such, they can be addressed by education or brief intervention conducted knowledgeably. The ARFID diagnosis pathologizes picky eating and implies a cure that is unlikely to be delivered. This psychiatric diagnosis puts intervention in the hands of mental health professionals, who are unlikely to be familiar with research and optimum practice around feeding and eating. They tend to use behavioral interventions that pressure the child to eat, exacerbate his reluctance to eat, and worsen the problem.  

Detect and remove the pressure; don’t diagnose

A mother writes: What are your thoughts on ARFID? Although my six-year-old son is a much happier kid since we have been following the division of responsibility in feeding and the pressure is off, he is still resistant. He has compared eating to being in a dungeon with a wall of spikes closing on him and diving in a pool of sharks. I don’t want him to be stuck with this eating problem. I just wonder if I am doing enough or what kind of approach or treatment do you think is suitable for ARFID?

Your son’s sharks and spikes describe his experience of being pressured to eat. If he is happier, you have come a long way. If he stays happier, he will push himself along to learn to eat a greater variety of food. But keep in mind this critical point: his being “resistant” means that something is going on with feeding that he has to resist. Namely, pressure. The solution is to detect and remove the pressure, not to diagnose him. Diagnosing is likely to increase the pressure, exacerbate his negative eating attitudes and behaviors about eating, and worsen his food consumption. His creative and colorful language aside, his eating is more than likely to be an extreme of normal. That being the case, you can manage it with skillful application of the division of responsibility in feeding. Resorting to a disease label will call for some as-yet undefined disease treatment. That will take his eating out of the realm of your feeding relationship and put it in the hands of a professional who may or may not know as much as you do about feeding.

Concerns raised by ARFID

As  you know, ARFID is a diagnosis established by the American Psychiatric Association1 (see sidebar). As demonstrated by our story, the public hears about this diagnosis, which uses common language to describe eating and feeding problems, and sees the diagnosis as offering a solution to those problems. The media heightens concern with horror stories about adults who only eat French fires or waffles and children who only eat chicken nuggets or peanut butter sandwiches. How are we to interpret and work with this diagnosis?

Diagnosing may catastrophize

Most problems with eating and feeding are not psychiatric disorders. They are problems, and, as such, they can be addressed by education or brief intervention conducted knowledgeably.

Diagnosing variants of normal as being pathological makes the problem seem far worse than it really is. Unfortunately, in today’s feeding and eating world, such variants are all too common. In repeated studies,25 more than half of adults test low in eating competence,6 meaning they feel negatively about their eating, are unreliable about feeding themselves, hesitate to let themselves eat food they enjoy, and are unlikely to pay attention to their hunger and fullness in guiding how much to eat. In fact, only 40% of people admit they enjoy eating, down from 50% 20 years ago.7 Almost all parents of preschoolers make feeding errors, including limiting menus to foods their children readily accept, then bribing and pressuring them to eat.8  Despite the national hysteria about child overweight, over 90% of parents say they don’t believe their children’s indications of fullness and encourage them to eat more.8,9 Such pressure doesn’t work: pressured children eat less well and behave badly at mealtime.10

Inclusion in DSM implies that picky eating is a psychiatric disorder

In most cases, problems with eating and feeding are not psychiatric disorders. They are problems, and, as such, they can be addressed by education or brief intervention conducted knowledgeably. In my view, to qualify for a psychiatric diagnosis, “marked interference with psychosocial functioning” (optional in the AAP definition) is essential.  For any eating malady to be a psychiatric disorder, a significant distortion in eating or feeding has to be precipitated and/or exacerbated by and interactive with underlying psychosocial distortion. Painful as it is, the malady serves the person or family’s psyche in some way. For children with feeding disorders, the underlying psychosocial distortion lies in the relationship with the parent.

DSM doesn’t consider the feeding literature

The DSM states that ARFID-related problems “most commonly develop in infancy or early childhood and may persist in adulthood.” It is certainly true that feeding errors in the early years create feeding problems that are exacerbated by later common fixes. However, the DSM review shows no evidence of the rich feeding literature which outlines the detail of distorted parent/child feeding interactions that precipitate and/or fail to extinguish food disorders.

DSM considers disorders in isolation

Child psychosocial issues are always part of established, problematic relationships with parents/primary care providers. Severe feeding problems must be considered in that context, and in the context of the child’s medical and developmental history.11 Affected adults carry internalized distortions from their own early feeding relationships. The parent-child feeding relationship is paramount, even when children contribute to “food intake disorders” by being irritable, having medical and/or oral-motor problems, developing atypically, or showing extreme food regulation patterns (e.g. don’t eat much or eat a great deal). 

DSM diagnosis implies cures that may or may not be delivered

Certainly, people need help with their feeding and eating. However, that help must be in proportion to the problem at hand, and it must be provided by people who truly understand eating and feeding. As a mental health professional myself, I have observed that, the same as the authors of DSM 5, mental health professionals are generally not familiar with research and optimum practice around feeding and eating. They  tend to take the sledgehammer approach.

Work must be in proportion to the problem at hand

Correcting such a preponderance of problems with eating and feeding means there is plenty of work to go around. However, that work must be in proportion to the problem at hand, and it must be done by people who truly understand eating and feeding.


  1.  Association AP. Feeding and Eating Disorders DSM-5: DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL OF MENTAL DISORDERS, FIFTH EDI T ION American Psychiatric Association; 2013:329-354
  2.  Quick V, Byrd-Bredbenner C, White AA, et al. Eat, Sleep, Work, Play: Associations of Weight Status and Health-Related Behaviors Among Young Adult College Students. Am J Health Promot. Dec 20 2013.
  3.  Lohse B. Facebook is an effective strategy to recruit low-income women to online nutrition education. J Nutr Educ Behav. Jan-Feb 2013;45(1):69-76.
  4.  Lohse B, Bailey RL, Krall JS, Wall DE, Mitchell DC. Diet quality is related to eating competence in cross-sectional sample of low-income females surveyed in Pennsylvania. Appetite. 2011;58:645-650.
  5.  Lohse B, Satter E, Horacek T, Gebreselassie T, Oakland MJ. Measuring Eating Competence: psychometric properties and validity of the ecSatter Inventory. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2007;39 (suppl):S154-S166.
  6.  Satter EM. Eating Competence: definition and evidence for the Satter Eating Competence Model. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2007;39:S142-S153.
  7.  Taylor P, Funk C, Craighill P. Pew Research Center; 2006.
  8.  Sherry B, McDivitt J, Birch L, et al. Attitudes, practices, and concerns about child feeding and child weight status among socioeconomically diverse white, Hispanic, and African-American mothers. J Am Diet Assoc. 2004;104:215-221.
  9.  Orrell-Valente JK, Hill LG, Brechwald WA, Dodge KA, Pettit GS, Bates JE. “Just three more bites”: an observational analysis of parents’ socialization of children’s eating at mealtime. Appetite. 2007;48:37-45.
  10.  Galloway AT, Fiorito LM, Francis LA, Birch LL. ‘Finish your soup’: counterproductive effects of pressuring children to eat on intake and affect. Appetite. May 2006;46(3):318-323.
  11.  Davies WH, Satter E, Berlin KS, et al. Reconceptualizing feeding and feeding disorders in interpersonal context: The case for a relational disorder. J Fam Psychol. 2006;20:409-417.

ARFID: American Psychiatric Association DSM 5 Diagnostic and Statistical Manual.

Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder replaces and extends the DSM-IV diagnosis of feeding disorder of infancy or early childhood. ARFID is an eating or feeding disturbance (e.g., apparent lack of interest in eating or food; avoidance based on the sensory characteristics of food; concern about aversive consequences of eating) as manifested by persistent failure to meet appropriate nutritional and/or energy needs associated with one (or more) of the following:

  1. Significant weight loss (or failure to achieve expected weight gain or faltering growth in children).
  2. Significant nutritional deficiency.
  3. Dependence on enteral feeding or oral nutritional supplements.
  4. Marked interference with psychosocial functioning.

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This